Monday, April 28, 2008

Is it okay to beat a woman?

There has been a lot of talk about race and gender in this year’s Democratic primary elections; and both topics have caused a good amount of conversation, but some claim that the misogynistic tone of media coverage and attacks on Senator Clinton is continuously overlooked and ignored as compared to the issue of race facing Obama. Recently, the following conversation played out between Newsweek’s Howard Fineman and Keith Olbermann, a MSNBC reporter, about Senator Hillary Clinton, which I think shows just one example of this:

Finemann: ultimately it is going to take "some adults somewhere in the Democratic party to step in and stop this thing, like a referee in a fight that could go on for thirty rounds. Those are the super, super, super delegates who are going to have to decide this."

Olbermann: "Right. Somebody who can take her into a room and only he comes out."


Here is a snapshot of one response to this segment posted on The Huffington Post: Eat the Press website:

What does that mean? Really, it can only mean one thing: Beating the crap out of Hillary Clinton, to the point where she is physically incapable of of getting up and walking out. At minimum. We know this. We know this because we have all seen movies where people are invited into private places to have "discussions" and the unruly party is, um, dealt with accordingly. It's an unmistakably violent image.

Do I really think Olbermann thinks Hillary Clinton should really be violently beaten to the point of physical incapacitation, or worse? No, though some have taken that statement to its logical conclusion. But it is an unmistakably violent image — and that point seems to be undisputed by those who have written about it so far (Google "Olbermann" and "take her into a room" and you'll see results like "Keith Olbermann Advocates Violence Against Hillary" "Olbermann: Misogyny 101" "Calls To End Race Turn Violent""Olbermann: How To Snuff Out Hillary Clinton"). Even Fineman seemed taken aback by the statement - there is a distinct pause after, and it's an eternity in TV time. He's not facing the camera but you can tell that the statement was jarring. (Even so he agreed, saying, "Yes, yes exactly.")

There really seems to be only one interpretation here, and the only point of debate is on whether it's okay or not. I'm going to cut that one short: It's not. To the fellow (male) journo I wrote to about this yesterday, who waved it off as just some colorful film-noir imagery, I say: can you IMAGINE if someone had said that about Obama? That he should be taken somewhere and dealt with, so that he wouldn't come back? Can you imagine if some right-winger had talked about getting Obama out of the race "the old-fashioned way?" If that last one makes you cringe, it should, because it evokes a history of violence against black people in this country that is raw and real. Well, frankly, the same goes for women — many of whom have been taken somewhere private, and never returned.

1 comment:

Jamia said...

Thanks so much for your post. It is repulsive how easy it is for comments like these to be made. I liken it to some of the comments that were made about Michelle Obama by really conservative pundits. I cringed when O'Reilly made the "lynch-mob" comment... Its about sublimating and undermining the power of people who some men in dominant culture feel entitled to control...They are so threatened by the uplift of certain racialized or gendered individuals that they have to cheaply go for the juggluar while at the sametime perpetuating attitudes and actions that affirm their dominance over all others...

i like unicorns. but like social justice... they only appear in my dreams.